Lately, within the case of Sesa Goa Restricted v The Joint Commissioner of Earnings-Tax (ITA No. 17/2013), the Excessive Courtroom of Bombay at Goa allowed a deduction in respect of cess (schooling cess and better and secondary schooling cess) from the enterprise revenue of the taxpayer.
As per the Earnings Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), the bottom tax legal responsibility of a tax payer is to be elevated by a surcharge (on the charges relevant for every class of taxpayer), and the combination of tax and surcharge is to be additional elevated by a ‘cess’ (earlier within the type of an schooling and better and secondary schooling cess on the price of three%, and now changed with a well being and schooling cess on the price of 4%).
Whereas computing the enterprise or skilled revenue of any taxpayer, a deduction is allowed for all bills that are incurred in relation to such enterprise (topic to sure exceptions). Nevertheless, by the use of a particular provision (Part 40(a)(ii) of the IT Act), a deduction with respect to any expenditure within the nature of a ‘price’ or ‘tax’ has been particularly disallowed.
The query which due to this fact arises is whether or not for the aim of this provision, a ‘cess’ could be thought-about as a ‘tax’ and would accordingly be disallowed as a enterprise expenditure. This subject has been handled within the aforesaid determination of the Excessive Courtroom of Bombay, as nicely the sooner determination given by the Excessive Courtroom of Rajasthan within the case of Chambal Fertilisers & Chemical compounds Ltd v Commissioner of Earnings-Tax, Vary 2, Kota (which has been adopted by the Earnings Tax Appellate Tribunal in a number of choices).
Resolution of the Bombay Excessive Courtroom
The important thing rivalry of the taxpayer on this case was the time period ‘any price or tax’ doesn’t embody ‘cess’ and due to this fact, cess needs to be allowable as a deduction towards its enterprise revenue.
In response, the tax division contended that ‘cess’ is inherently included within the scope of the expression ‘any price or tax’ and due to this fact, shouldn’t be allowed as a deduction.
The Excessive Courtroom examined the legislative historical past in relation to Part 40(a)(ii) of the IT Act and famous the next:
- The Earnings Tax Invoice, 1961 which launched Part 40(a)(ii) into the IT Act, contained the expression ‘cess, price or tax’ and due to this fact particularly included ‘cess’ as an merchandise separate from tax. Nevertheless, a Choose Committee of the Parliament omitted the time period ‘cess’ underneath the ultimate provisions; and
- This subject has additionally been handled in a round issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) dated 18 Could 1967, which particularly refers back to the omission of the time period ‘cess’ made by the Choose Committee of the Parliament (as mentioned above), and states that the impact of the omission of the phrase ‘cess’ is that solely taxes paid are to be disallowed.
The Excessive Courtroom due to this fact noticed that the legislature might have simply included reference to cess within the provision, and non-inclusion of the identical reveals the intention to permit such cess as a deduction, and due to this fact determined in favour of the taxpayer.
.Whereas the impugned judgement has been rendered within the context of schooling cess and better and secondary schooling cess, the precept would equally maintain good for well being and schooling cess as nicely. Primarily based on this determination and the sooner determination of the Excessive Courtroom of Rajasthan, taxpayers might discover the chance to say a deduction with respect to the ‘cess’ paid on the essential tax quantity. Furthermore, aside from the above CBDT round, the taxpayer can also take steerage from different provisions underneath the IT Act underneath which tax has been outlined, and a distinction has been made between tax and cess
Nevertheless, with respect to the quantum or proportion of cess which can be claimed as a deduction in annually, some points might have additional analysis. For instance, it’s unclear whether or not the deduction with respect to cess needs to be restricted solely to cess paid on the enterprise revenue of the taxpayer (since such deduction is allowed towards the enterprise revenue of a taxpayer), and whether or not such deduction should be allowed on an accrual foundation or on a fee foundation.
“The content material of this doc don’t essentially mirror the views / place of Khaitan & Co however stay solely these of the writer(s). For any additional queries or comply with up please contact Khaitan & Co at firstname.lastname@example.org”
— to www.lexology.com